<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 924 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764860</link>
    <description>The HC quashed the impugned order dated 25.03.2023 for failure to comply with Section 75(4) of the GST Act and breach of natural justice, noting that the original decision did not afford the mandatory opportunity of hearing. The matter is remanded to the tax authority (respondent no.3) to pass fresh orders after permitting filing of a reply to the show-cause notice and affording a hearing. The petition is allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2025 14:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=790174" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 924 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764860</link>
      <description>The HC quashed the impugned order dated 25.03.2023 for failure to comply with Section 75(4) of the GST Act and breach of natural justice, noting that the original decision did not afford the mandatory opportunity of hearing. The matter is remanded to the tax authority (respondent no.3) to pass fresh orders after permitting filing of a reply to the show-cause notice and affording a hearing. The petition is allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764860</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>