https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764861 The SC, consisting of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan, reviewed a Special Leave Petition challenging an HC order under Section 73 of the CGST Act, 2017. The HC had dismissed the Writ Petition, citing an available alternative remedy through appeal. The SC upheld the HC's decision, finding no reason to intervene. However, it advised that if the petitioner appeals under Section 73, the Appellate Authority should consider the petitioner's prior attempts to seek remedies in the HC and SC, especially concerning limitation issues. The petition and pending applications were disposed of. en-us Fri, 03 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Jan 2025 08:10:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764861 The SC, consisting of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan, reviewed a Special Leave Petition challenging an HC order under Section 73 of the CGST Act, 2017. The HC had dismissed the Writ Petition, citing an available alternative remedy through appeal. The SC upheld the HC's decision, finding no reason to intervene. However, it advised that if the petitioner appeals under Section 73, the Appellate Authority should consider the petitioner's prior attempts to seek remedies in the HC and SC, especially concerning limitation issues. The petition and pending applications were disposed of. Case-Laws GST Fri, 03 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764861