<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 917 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460299</link>
    <description>Unconditional bank guarantees are ordinarily enforceable according to their terms, but ad interim injunction may be granted in exceptional cases of clear fraud, special equities, or irretrievable injury. Applying that settled rule, the Delhi HC treated the nationwide COVID-19 lockdown as prima facie force majeure, noted that work had continued until the lockdown intervened, and found that restrictions materially disrupted personnel movement and drilling operations. On those materials, the Court accepted a prima facie case for special equities and a risk of irretrievable prejudice, and restrained invocation and encashment of the bank guarantees pending further hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jan 2025 10:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=790040" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 917 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460299</link>
      <description>Unconditional bank guarantees are ordinarily enforceable according to their terms, but ad interim injunction may be granted in exceptional cases of clear fraud, special equities, or irretrievable injury. Applying that settled rule, the Delhi HC treated the nationwide COVID-19 lockdown as prima facie force majeure, noted that work had continued until the lockdown intervened, and found that restrictions materially disrupted personnel movement and drilling operations. On those materials, the Court accepted a prima facie case for special equities and a risk of irretrievable prejudice, and restrained invocation and encashment of the bank guarantees pending further hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460299</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>