<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Petitioner entitled to reimbursement of additional GST, interest on delayed payments.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84994</link>
    <description>The HC held that the petitioner is entitled to reimbursement of the additional GST amount and interest on delayed payments. The writ petition was maintainable despite the presence of an arbitration clause, relying on the Division Bench&#039;s order in M/S APEX STRUCTURE PVT. LTD. case, wherein the respondent was directed to pay the difference of GST amount with interest within a specified period, failing which interest would accrue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 18 Jan 2025 08:47:30 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jan 2025 08:47:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=789996" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Petitioner entitled to reimbursement of additional GST, interest on delayed payments.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84994</link>
      <description>The HC held that the petitioner is entitled to reimbursement of the additional GST amount and interest on delayed payments. The writ petition was maintainable despite the presence of an arbitration clause, relying on the Division Bench&#039;s order in M/S APEX STRUCTURE PVT. LTD. case, wherein the respondent was directed to pay the difference of GST amount with interest within a specified period, failing which interest would accrue.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Jan 2025 08:47:30 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84994</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>