<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 853 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764789</link>
    <description>In SEBI Act compounding proceedings, the Court may examine the material considered by SEBI&#039;s HPAC and Whole Time Members to assess whether the applicant meets the recognised compounding guidelines, including the gravity of the violation, conduct of the applicant, and the public character of the offence. Regulation 29 of the SEBI (Settlement Proceedings) Regulations, 2018 does not bar such limited judicial scrutiny, although confidentiality may still be protected through sealed cover. The applicant&#039;s request for production was therefore allowed, and the refusal to entertain the Section 91 request was set aside, with the trial court left to decide whether the documents should be supplied to the applicant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2025 17:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=789952" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 853 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764789</link>
      <description>In SEBI Act compounding proceedings, the Court may examine the material considered by SEBI&#039;s HPAC and Whole Time Members to assess whether the applicant meets the recognised compounding guidelines, including the gravity of the violation, conduct of the applicant, and the public character of the offence. Regulation 29 of the SEBI (Settlement Proceedings) Regulations, 2018 does not bar such limited judicial scrutiny, although confidentiality may still be protected through sealed cover. The applicant&#039;s request for production was therefore allowed, and the refusal to entertain the Section 91 request was set aside, with the trial court left to decide whether the documents should be supplied to the applicant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764789</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>