<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (9) TMI 3 - HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40464</link>
    <description>When an original excise order is carried in appeal or revision, the operative order becomes that of the appellate or revisional authority under the merger principle. If those higher authorities have disposed of the matter and lie outside the High Court&#039;s territorial jurisdiction, the Court cannot indirectly challenge their orders by issuing a writ against the original authority. The writ was therefore not maintainable, and relief was refused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 13:32:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=78995" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (9) TMI 3 - HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40464</link>
      <description>When an original excise order is carried in appeal or revision, the operative order becomes that of the appellate or revisional authority under the merger principle. If those higher authorities have disposed of the matter and lie outside the High Court&#039;s territorial jurisdiction, the Court cannot indirectly challenge their orders by issuing a writ against the original authority. The writ was therefore not maintainable, and relief was refused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40464</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>