<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 863 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764799</link>
    <description>The ITAT Jaipur allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding disallowance under section 14A for expenses related to earning exempt income. The tribunal held that since the assessee&#039;s shareholder funds and reserves exceeded total equity investments as of March 31, 2018, sufficient own funds were available for investments. Following the precedent in Sintex Industries Ltd, where surplus funds of Rs.1981.55 crores against investments of Rs.144.51 crores negated any disallowance, the tribunal ruled no estimation of expenditure under rule 8D was required. The disallowance of interest and administrative expenses was therefore unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2025 11:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=789942" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 863 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764799</link>
      <description>The ITAT Jaipur allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding disallowance under section 14A for expenses related to earning exempt income. The tribunal held that since the assessee&#039;s shareholder funds and reserves exceeded total equity investments as of March 31, 2018, sufficient own funds were available for investments. Following the precedent in Sintex Industries Ltd, where surplus funds of Rs.1981.55 crores against investments of Rs.144.51 crores negated any disallowance, the tribunal ruled no estimation of expenditure under rule 8D was required. The disallowance of interest and administrative expenses was therefore unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764799</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>