<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 867 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764803</link>
    <description>ITAT Pune held that penalty under section 271E for violating section 269T provisions was not leviable due to reasonable cause under section 273B. The assessee made loan repayments through modes other than account payee cheques/drafts. While transactions with related parties attracted penalty, adjustments of security deposits against outstanding receivables from Customer Sales Agents through journal entries constituted reasonable cause. Following Ajitnath Hi-Tech Builders precedent, the tribunal deleted the penalty despite technical breach of section 269SS, finding reasonable cause for the violation and deciding in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2025 20:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=789938" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 867 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764803</link>
      <description>ITAT Pune held that penalty under section 271E for violating section 269T provisions was not leviable due to reasonable cause under section 273B. The assessee made loan repayments through modes other than account payee cheques/drafts. While transactions with related parties attracted penalty, adjustments of security deposits against outstanding receivables from Customer Sales Agents through journal entries constituted reasonable cause. Following Ajitnath Hi-Tech Builders precedent, the tribunal deleted the penalty despite technical breach of section 269SS, finding reasonable cause for the violation and deciding in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764803</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>