<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 878 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764814</link>
    <description>The Delhi HC upheld ITAT&#039;s order ruling that Section 115JB (Minimum Alternate Tax on book profits) was inapplicable to electricity generation and distribution companies prior to the Finance Act, 2012 amendment. The court decided in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue, finding no infirmity in the tribunal&#039;s decision that exempted the electricity company from MAT provisions under the pre-amendment law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2025 09:58:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=789927" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 878 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764814</link>
      <description>The Delhi HC upheld ITAT&#039;s order ruling that Section 115JB (Minimum Alternate Tax on book profits) was inapplicable to electricity generation and distribution companies prior to the Finance Act, 2012 amendment. The court decided in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue, finding no infirmity in the tribunal&#039;s decision that exempted the electricity company from MAT provisions under the pre-amendment law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764814</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>