<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 880 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764816</link>
    <description>A foreign enterprise does not obtain a fixed place permanent establishment in India merely because expatriate employees are seconded to an Indian subsidiary and interact at its premises. A fixed place PE requires the foreign enterprise&#039;s own business to be carried on through a place at its disposal and under its control in a meaningful sense; here, the secondees were found to be supporting the subsidiary, not conducting the assessee&#039;s core business. The same reasoning defeated the claim of a deemed PE, because the personnel were engaged in reporting, coordination, and support functions for the subsidiary rather than in carrying on the foreign enterprise&#039;s business in India. The tribunal&#039;s rejection of taxability on that basis was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2025 16:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=789925" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 880 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764816</link>
      <description>A foreign enterprise does not obtain a fixed place permanent establishment in India merely because expatriate employees are seconded to an Indian subsidiary and interact at its premises. A fixed place PE requires the foreign enterprise&#039;s own business to be carried on through a place at its disposal and under its control in a meaningful sense; here, the secondees were found to be supporting the subsidiary, not conducting the assessee&#039;s core business. The same reasoning defeated the claim of a deemed PE, because the personnel were engaged in reporting, coordination, and support functions for the subsidiary rather than in carrying on the foreign enterprise&#039;s business in India. The tribunal&#039;s rejection of taxability on that basis was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764816</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>