https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764817 The Delhi HC addressed two main issues: the provisional attachment of the petitioners' bank accounts and the seizure of their assets. Regarding the bank accounts, the court upheld the Commissioner's decision to maintain the attachment, as the petitioners did not seek further relief. For the seized assets, the court directed the Commissioner to provide copies of the data from the seized devices to the petitioners, acknowledging their rights under the CGST Act. The court scheduled further hearings to ensure compliance with its directives on the data provision issue. en-us Thu, 25 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Jan 2025 08:47:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764817 The Delhi HC addressed two main issues: the provisional attachment of the petitioners' bank accounts and the seizure of their assets. Regarding the bank accounts, the court upheld the Commissioner's decision to maintain the attachment, as the petitioners did not seek further relief. For the seized assets, the court directed the Commissioner to provide copies of the data from the seized devices to the petitioners, acknowledging their rights under the CGST Act. The court scheduled further hearings to ensure compliance with its directives on the data provision issue. Case-Laws GST Thu, 25 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764817