https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764824 A writ petition seeking payment of differential GST was treated as maintainable despite an alternative contractual remedy because no disputed question of fact required reference to the dispute resolution mechanism. The GST rate on the petitioner's work had increased from 12% to 18% from 01.01.2022, and the respondent had already accepted liability for the additional 6%. On that basis, the petitioner's claim for the tax differential was accepted, and the respondent was directed to pay the differential GST within the stipulated time, failing which interest would accrue. en-us Wed, 15 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Jun 2025 10:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764824 A writ petition seeking payment of differential GST was treated as maintainable despite an alternative contractual remedy because no disputed question of fact required reference to the dispute resolution mechanism. The GST rate on the petitioner's work had increased from 12% to 18% from 01.01.2022, and the respondent had already accepted liability for the additional 6%. On that basis, the petitioner's claim for the tax differential was accepted, and the respondent was directed to pay the differential GST within the stipulated time, failing which interest would accrue. Case-Laws GST Wed, 15 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764824