<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (7) TMI 52 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40452</link>
    <description>Rule 29 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 requires a curer to report transfer of ownership of cured tobacco to, and obtain acknowledgment from, the proper officer. The proper officer is the officer having jurisdiction over the place where curing operations occur, as reflected in the definition and the related accounting rules. Reporting and acknowledgment at the curing location are sufficient to end the curer&#039;s duty liability; the officer having jurisdiction over the transferee&#039;s warehouse may address the transferee&#039;s own stock liability but cannot require further compliance from the curer solely because goods moved under a transport certificate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 12:55:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=78983" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (7) TMI 52 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40452</link>
      <description>Rule 29 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 requires a curer to report transfer of ownership of cured tobacco to, and obtain acknowledgment from, the proper officer. The proper officer is the officer having jurisdiction over the place where curing operations occur, as reflected in the definition and the related accounting rules. Reporting and acknowledgment at the curing location are sufficient to end the curer&#039;s duty liability; the officer having jurisdiction over the transferee&#039;s warehouse may address the transferee&#039;s own stock liability but cannot require further compliance from the curer solely because goods moved under a transport certificate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40452</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>