<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (7) TMI 51 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40451</link>
    <description>Tariff item 14-E of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 applied only to patent or proprietary medicines, meaning preparations bearing a non-pharmacopoeial name or a brand mark showing a trade connection with the particular medicine. The Madras HC held that a manufacturer&#039;s name or a common house mark used across all products did not, by itself, establish a proprietary character in the three pharmaceutical preparations. Because the mark relied on was not a distinct brand assigned only to those medicines, the preparations did not fall within tariff item 14-E and were not excisable as patent or proprietary medicines; the excise demand was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 12:54:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=78982" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (7) TMI 51 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40451</link>
      <description>Tariff item 14-E of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 applied only to patent or proprietary medicines, meaning preparations bearing a non-pharmacopoeial name or a brand mark showing a trade connection with the particular medicine. The Madras HC held that a manufacturer&#039;s name or a common house mark used across all products did not, by itself, establish a proprietary character in the three pharmaceutical preparations. Because the mark relied on was not a distinct brand assigned only to those medicines, the preparations did not fall within tariff item 14-E and were not excisable as patent or proprietary medicines; the excise demand was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40451</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>