<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 767 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460270</link>
    <description>A review of a release order was held not maintainable after the respondent&#039;s revision had already been dismissed on merits and the vacancy declaration had attained finality. The Court noted that the earlier revision order did not rest on a technical dismissal alone; it also affirmed that the vacancy had become final, the respondent lacked locus standi, and the release order suffered from no illegality or infirmity. Once that order had been upheld on merits, a review against the same order could not be pursued. The impugned order and the revisional order were set aside, and the review petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2025 15:31:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=789760" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 767 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460270</link>
      <description>A review of a release order was held not maintainable after the respondent&#039;s revision had already been dismissed on merits and the vacancy declaration had attained finality. The Court noted that the earlier revision order did not rest on a technical dismissal alone; it also affirmed that the vacancy had become final, the respondent lacked locus standi, and the release order suffered from no illegality or infirmity. Once that order had been upheld on merits, a review against the same order could not be pursued. The impugned order and the revisional order were set aside, and the review petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460270</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>