<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 1484 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460257</link>
    <description>Madras HC addressed territorial jurisdiction in a writ petition. The court determined that the Principal Seat lacks jurisdiction when the entire cause of action arose in Madurai Bench&#039;s territory. Despite the first respondent&#039;s office being in Chennai, the court emphasized that jurisdiction is linked to the cause of action&#039;s location. The petition was dismissed, with liberty to refile in the appropriate jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 13:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=789727" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 1484 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460257</link>
      <description>Madras HC addressed territorial jurisdiction in a writ petition. The court determined that the Principal Seat lacks jurisdiction when the entire cause of action arose in Madurai Bench&#039;s territory. Despite the first respondent&#039;s office being in Chennai, the court emphasized that jurisdiction is linked to the cause of action&#039;s location. The petition was dismissed, with liberty to refile in the appropriate jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460257</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>