<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 1485 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460258</link>
    <description>Protection against arrest in a GST investigation was sought through a writ of mandamus restraining arrest pursuant to summons. The respondent opposed the apprehension, stating that the petitioner had not appeared in response to summons and that no statement had yet been recorded under the GST law. The HC did not decide the arrest protection claim on merits at this stage; it issued notice on the writ petition and granted time for a reply, leaving the matter for further hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 10:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=789726" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 1485 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460258</link>
      <description>Protection against arrest in a GST investigation was sought through a writ of mandamus restraining arrest pursuant to summons. The respondent opposed the apprehension, stating that the petitioner had not appeared in response to summons and that no statement had yet been recorded under the GST law. The HC did not decide the arrest protection claim on merits at this stage; it issued notice on the writ petition and granted time for a reply, leaving the matter for further hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460258</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>