https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460259 Assessment orders were not interfered with because the record showed reminders for personal hearing had been issued and the petitioner had sought extensions but did not respond. On that factual basis, the court rejected the challenge to the assessment orders. Since a rectification application was stated to be pending, a limited direction was issued to the respondent to consider and decide that application within 15 days, with liberty to the petitioner to pursue an appeal if advised. en-us Fri, 20 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Apr 2025 10:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460259 Assessment orders were not interfered with because the record showed reminders for personal hearing had been issued and the petitioner had sought extensions but did not respond. On that factual basis, the court rejected the challenge to the assessment orders. Since a rectification application was stated to be pending, a limited direction was issued to the respondent to consider and decide that application within 15 days, with liberty to the petitioner to pursue an appeal if advised. Case-Laws GST Fri, 20 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460259