<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 837 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764773</link>
    <description>HC quashed penalty under Section 129 of GST Act for failure to register additional place of business. Petitioner&#039;s goods were detained despite having valid e-way bill and invoice generated before detention. Court held that procedural irregularities without fraudulent intent, including non-registration of additional business place, constituted only technical and venial breach. Since there was no variance between invoice quantities and actual goods seized, imposing penalty would be harsh. Petition allowed, impugned order quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2025 08:46:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=789646" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 837 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764773</link>
      <description>HC quashed penalty under Section 129 of GST Act for failure to register additional place of business. Petitioner&#039;s goods were detained despite having valid e-way bill and invoice generated before detention. Court held that procedural irregularities without fraudulent intent, including non-registration of additional business place, constituted only technical and venial breach. Since there was no variance between invoice quantities and actual goods seized, imposing penalty would be harsh. Petition allowed, impugned order quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764773</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>