<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 834 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764770</link>
    <description>NCLAT allowed in part an application seeking approval to collapse transactions between IL FS Financial Services Ltd. and third party borrowers. The tribunal approved unwinding of most transactions but excluded certain respondents (Nos. 8-12) where no agreements existed and SIFL claimed the advanced amounts originated from them rather than the third party borrowers. NCLAT determined these complex transactions required deeper examination by NCLT in pending proceedings. The IRP&#039;s rejection of IFIN&#039;s claim in the CIRP was set aside, restoring IFIN&#039;s status in the resolution process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2025 08:46:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=789643" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 834 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764770</link>
      <description>NCLAT allowed in part an application seeking approval to collapse transactions between IL FS Financial Services Ltd. and third party borrowers. The tribunal approved unwinding of most transactions but excluded certain respondents (Nos. 8-12) where no agreements existed and SIFL claimed the advanced amounts originated from them rather than the third party borrowers. NCLAT determined these complex transactions required deeper examination by NCLT in pending proceedings. The IRP&#039;s rejection of IFIN&#039;s claim in the CIRP was set aside, restoring IFIN&#039;s status in the resolution process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764770</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>