<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court upholds 20% deposit of fine for appeal u/s 148 Negotiable Instruments Act.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84926</link>
    <description>HC upheld condition imposed by Sessions Judge requiring applicant to deposit 20% of fine amount u/s 148 of NI Act. Relying on SC&#039;s observations in Ashok Kumar v. State of Uttarakhand, HC held appellate court may impose deposit condition u/s 148, except where unjust or depriving accused&#039;s right to appeal. HC found no special circumstance warranting exception in applicant&#039;s case. Application dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2025 08:45:41 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2025 08:45:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=789627" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court upholds 20% deposit of fine for appeal u/s 148 Negotiable Instruments Act.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84926</link>
      <description>HC upheld condition imposed by Sessions Judge requiring applicant to deposit 20% of fine amount u/s 148 of NI Act. Relying on SC&#039;s observations in Ashok Kumar v. State of Uttarakhand, HC held appellate court may impose deposit condition u/s 148, except where unjust or depriving accused&#039;s right to appeal. HC found no special circumstance warranting exception in applicant&#039;s case. Application dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2025 08:45:41 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84926</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>