https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84947 The HC held that the second notice issued u/s 148A(b) was a standalone notice, not a continuation of the first notice. The information on which the notices were based was completely different. As the second standalone notice was issued beyond the 3-year period stipulated u/s 149(1)(a) for reopening assessment where escaped income is less than Rs. 50 lakhs, it was barred by limitation. Consequently, the HC set aside the impugned order u/s 148A(d) and the notice u/s 148A(b), deciding in favor of the assessee. en-us Fri, 17 Jan 2025 08:45:41 +0530 Fri, 17 Jan 2025 08:45:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84947 The HC held that the second notice issued u/s 148A(b) was a standalone notice, not a continuation of the first notice. The information on which the notices were based was completely different. As the second standalone notice was issued beyond the 3-year period stipulated u/s 149(1)(a) for reopening assessment where escaped income is less than Rs. 50 lakhs, it was barred by limitation. Consequently, the HC set aside the impugned order u/s 148A(d) and the notice u/s 148A(b), deciding in favor of the assessee. Highlights Income Tax Fri, 17 Jan 2025 08:45:41 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84947