https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764759 The court dismissed the petition for a Writ of Mandamus, finding it "entirely misconceived" and "blissfully vague." The petitioner failed to specify the information sought or pursue alternative remedies under the Right to Information Act, 2005. The court emphasized the necessity for specificity in legal petitions and the exhaustion of alternative remedies. The petition was deemed not maintainable, and the petitioner was ordered to pay exemplary costs of Rupees One Lakh to the Government KEM Hospital, Parel, within four weeks, with proof of payment required by 17 February 2025. en-us Tue, 14 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Jan 2025 08:45:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764759 The court dismissed the petition for a Writ of Mandamus, finding it "entirely misconceived" and "blissfully vague." The petitioner failed to specify the information sought or pursue alternative remedies under the Right to Information Act, 2005. The court emphasized the necessity for specificity in legal petitions and the exhaustion of alternative remedies. The petition was deemed not maintainable, and the petitioner was ordered to pay exemplary costs of Rupees One Lakh to the Government KEM Hospital, Parel, within four weeks, with proof of payment required by 17 February 2025. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 14 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764759