<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 833 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764769</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed a review petition against its earlier order in the GST dispute after noting that the underlying civil appeals had already been disposed of on the basis that the issues were covered by Intercontinental Consultants and Technocrats Private Limited. The Court found no reason to reopen the matter, also noting a 305-day delay in filing the review. The review was dismissed both for delay and on merits, and no costs were imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2025 08:45:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=789561" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 833 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764769</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed a review petition against its earlier order in the GST dispute after noting that the underlying civil appeals had already been disposed of on the basis that the issues were covered by Intercontinental Consultants and Technocrats Private Limited. The Court found no reason to reopen the matter, also noting a 305-day delay in filing the review. The review was dismissed both for delay and on merits, and no costs were imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764769</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>