<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (7) TMI 4 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40425</link>
    <description>Cotton fabrics manufactured on power-looms owned by a co-operative society remained eligible for excise exemption where the notifications did not say the fabrics had to be produced for the society&#039;s own account. The Court applied strict construction of exemption notifications and held that, in a taxing instrument, plain language controls and no additional limitation can be read in by implication. The object of the exemption could not override the express words, and a casus omissus could not be supplied by interpretation. The excise demand and penalty were therefore unsustainable, and the writ relief quashing the demand was granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2019 12:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=78956" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (7) TMI 4 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40425</link>
      <description>Cotton fabrics manufactured on power-looms owned by a co-operative society remained eligible for excise exemption where the notifications did not say the fabrics had to be produced for the society&#039;s own account. The Court applied strict construction of exemption notifications and held that, in a taxing instrument, plain language controls and no additional limitation can be read in by implication. The object of the exemption could not override the express words, and a casus omissus could not be supplied by interpretation. The excise demand and penalty were therefore unsustainable, and the writ relief quashing the demand was granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40425</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>