<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1736 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460234</link>
    <description>Delegation of RERA Authority functions may validly empower a single member to hear and decide complaints where the Authority has resolved to confer those powers under the statutory framework. A jurisdictional objection based on the Authority&#039;s composition was therefore rejected. A promoter who has received an allottee&#039;s consideration but fails to deliver possession for years cannot retain the funds indefinitely; refund with interest may be directed under the applicable statutory provisions and agreement terms. Challenges to the interest rate and the ex parte nature of proceedings were also rejected, sustaining the regulatory refund and recovery action.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:32:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=789534" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1736 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460234</link>
      <description>Delegation of RERA Authority functions may validly empower a single member to hear and decide complaints where the Authority has resolved to confer those powers under the statutory framework. A jurisdictional objection based on the Authority&#039;s composition was therefore rejected. A promoter who has received an allottee&#039;s consideration but fails to deliver possession for years cannot retain the funds indefinitely; refund with interest may be directed under the applicable statutory provisions and agreement terms. Challenges to the interest rate and the ex parte nature of proceedings were also rejected, sustaining the regulatory refund and recovery action.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460234</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>