https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460235 Proceedings under the real estate regulatory framework are not invalidated merely because the Authority acts with a vacancy, defect in constitution, or irregularity in appointment, especially where the statutory scheme permits functioning and no timely objection was raised. A challenge to the merits of a refund and interest order was treated as a matter for appeal, so writ interference was declined on the basis of alternative remedy. The recovery provisions were construed purposively to support effective enforcement of refund directions, avoiding a fragmented execution process that would frustrate speedy consumer relief. The document also notes that the challenge to the vires of the regulation was left open for future consideration if invoked. en-us Fri, 29 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:32:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460235 Proceedings under the real estate regulatory framework are not invalidated merely because the Authority acts with a vacancy, defect in constitution, or irregularity in appointment, especially where the statutory scheme permits functioning and no timely objection was raised. A challenge to the merits of a refund and interest order was treated as a matter for appeal, so writ interference was declined on the basis of alternative remedy. The recovery provisions were construed purposively to support effective enforcement of refund directions, avoiding a fragmented execution process that would frustrate speedy consumer relief. The document also notes that the challenge to the vires of the regulation was left open for future consideration if invoked. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 29 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460235