https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460236 Interlocutory arbitral orders are ordinarily not open to interference under Article 227 where the Arbitration and Conciliation Act provides limited appellate review under Section 37 and post-award challenge under Section 34. A challenge to an interim order may be raised against the final award, including on the ground that the award travels beyond the terms of reference. An order refusing termination of proceedings under Section 32(2)(c) merely keeps the arbitration alive, and an order permitting amendment of the claim under Section 23(3) is likewise interlocutory and does not decide the merits. In the absence of exceptional circumstances, bad faith, or jurisdictional excess, constitutional interference is unwarranted. en-us Tue, 22 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:32:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460236 Interlocutory arbitral orders are ordinarily not open to interference under Article 227 where the Arbitration and Conciliation Act provides limited appellate review under Section 37 and post-award challenge under Section 34. A challenge to an interim order may be raised against the final award, including on the ground that the award travels beyond the terms of reference. An order refusing termination of proceedings under Section 32(2)(c) merely keeps the arbitration alive, and an order permitting amendment of the claim under Section 23(3) is likewise interlocutory and does not decide the merits. In the absence of exceptional circumstances, bad faith, or jurisdictional excess, constitutional interference is unwarranted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 22 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460236