https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460238 The SC upheld the validity of Regulation 9, accepted the delegation of powers under Section 81, and affirmed that RERA prevails over SARFAESI where there is conflict. It also held that RERA does not generally apply to prior mortgage transactions unless fraud or collusion is shown, and that the RERA authority can exercise jurisdiction against a secured creditor in proceedings under Section 13(4) of SARFAESI. On these conclusions, the Special Leave Petitions were dismissed. en-us Mon, 14 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:32:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460238 The SC upheld the validity of Regulation 9, accepted the delegation of powers under Section 81, and affirmed that RERA prevails over SARFAESI where there is conflict. It also held that RERA does not generally apply to prior mortgage transactions unless fraud or collusion is shown, and that the RERA authority can exercise jurisdiction against a secured creditor in proceedings under Section 13(4) of SARFAESI. On these conclusions, the Special Leave Petitions were dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 14 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460238