<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 1650 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460240</link>
    <description>The SC set aside the NCLAT order and upheld the NCLT&#039;s approval of the amalgamation scheme, confirming the scheme as it applied to four private companies with the appellant. Although it was alleged the valuer disregarded proper methodology and proceeded by guesswork in fixing the share exchange ratio, the Court found it appropriate to confirm the NCLT&#039;s order and disposed of the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2025 17:56:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=789528" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 1650 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460240</link>
      <description>The SC set aside the NCLAT order and upheld the NCLT&#039;s approval of the amalgamation scheme, confirming the scheme as it applied to four private companies with the appellant. Although it was alleged the valuer disregarded proper methodology and proceeded by guesswork in fixing the share exchange ratio, the Court found it appropriate to confirm the NCLT&#039;s order and disposed of the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460240</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>