https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460232 Assam was unlawfully excluded from the 1964 Foreigners Tribunal regime, because a subordinate order cannot create an arbitrary territorial exception or defeat binding judicial directions; the exclusion was held discriminatory and violative of Articles 14 and 355. The 2006 procedure was also invalid because it required prima facie establishment of basic facts before reference and notice, which conflicted with the Foreigners Act, 1946 by shifting the initial evidentiary burden away from the person proceeded against. The impugned order was quashed, and implementation of the 1964 Order was reaffirmed. en-us Tue, 05 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Jan 2025 11:08:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460232 Assam was unlawfully excluded from the 1964 Foreigners Tribunal regime, because a subordinate order cannot create an arbitrary territorial exception or defeat binding judicial directions; the exclusion was held discriminatory and violative of Articles 14 and 355. The 2006 procedure was also invalid because it required prima facie establishment of basic facts before reference and notice, which conflicted with the Foreigners Act, 1946 by shifting the initial evidentiary burden away from the person proceeded against. The impugned order was quashed, and implementation of the 1964 Order was reaffirmed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 05 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460232