<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 753 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764689</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi dismissed revenue&#039;s appeal against CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of addition made in assessee company&#039;s hands regarding cash payments to farmers seized during search. Court found assessee acted merely as commission agent for another company, with no evidence of asset purchase or payments routed through assessee&#039;s bank accounts. CIT(A) had remitted matter back to AO for proper verification, causing no prejudice to revenue. Addition deletion upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2025 08:17:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=789296" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 753 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764689</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi dismissed revenue&#039;s appeal against CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of addition made in assessee company&#039;s hands regarding cash payments to farmers seized during search. Court found assessee acted merely as commission agent for another company, with no evidence of asset purchase or payments routed through assessee&#039;s bank accounts. CIT(A) had remitted matter back to AO for proper verification, causing no prejudice to revenue. Addition deletion upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764689</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>