<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 756 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764692</link>
    <description>The ITAT Kolkata quashed reassessment proceedings u/s 147 and additions u/s 68 for unexplained share capital. The AO reopened assessment based on search material suggesting the assessee received bogus share capital from three subscribers. The tribunal held the AO failed to independently verify creditworthiness and genuineness of transactions, instead relying on borrowed satisfaction from search enquiries. Following precedents from Calcutta HC and SC, the tribunal ruled that mere non-production of directors cannot justify additions u/s 68 when PAN and creditor details are provided. The reassessment and assessment orders were quashed, allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 10:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=789293" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 756 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764692</link>
      <description>The ITAT Kolkata quashed reassessment proceedings u/s 147 and additions u/s 68 for unexplained share capital. The AO reopened assessment based on search material suggesting the assessee received bogus share capital from three subscribers. The tribunal held the AO failed to independently verify creditworthiness and genuineness of transactions, instead relying on borrowed satisfaction from search enquiries. Following precedents from Calcutta HC and SC, the tribunal ruled that mere non-production of directors cannot justify additions u/s 68 when PAN and creditor details are provided. The reassessment and assessment orders were quashed, allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764692</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>