<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1974 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460229</link>
    <description>ITAT Surat upheld CIT(A)&#039;s decision restricting disallowance to 5% of non-genuine purchases for AY 2013-14. The tribunal found that while assessee made actual purchases, invoices were obtained from bogus suppliers who may have inflated purchase amounts. Since corresponding sales genuineness was not disputed by AO and entire purchases could not be treated as bogus, the 5% disallowance was deemed reasonable. Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 20:53:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=789236" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1974 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460229</link>
      <description>ITAT Surat upheld CIT(A)&#039;s decision restricting disallowance to 5% of non-genuine purchases for AY 2013-14. The tribunal found that while assessee made actual purchases, invoices were obtained from bogus suppliers who may have inflated purchase amounts. Since corresponding sales genuineness was not disputed by AO and entire purchases could not be treated as bogus, the 5% disallowance was deemed reasonable. Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460229</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>