https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=30379 A long running PIL alleged that state budget funds were used to install life size statues of a political leader and party symbols, contrary to Election Commission circulars, and sought investigation and remedial measures. The Supreme Court disposed of the petition as most prayers had become infructuous, observed that the installations were already completed so a stay could not be granted, and noted the existence of Election Commission guidelines. The respondent asserted the works reflected the will of the people and were funded through budgetary appropriations sanctioned by the state legislature. en-us Wed, 15 Jan 2025 19:46:03 +0530 Wed, 15 Jan 2025 19:46:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=30379 A long running PIL alleged that state budget funds were used to install life size statues of a political leader and party symbols, contrary to Election Commission circulars, and sought investigation and remedial measures. The Supreme Court disposed of the petition as most prayers had become infructuous, observed that the installations were already completed so a stay could not be granted, and noted the existence of Election Commission guidelines. The respondent asserted the works reflected the will of the people and were funded through budgetary appropriations sanctioned by the state legislature. News - Wed, 15 Jan 2025 19:46:03 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=30379