https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460215 An Arpannama was construed, read with the connected lease arrangement, as an absolute transfer of the shebaiti right represented by the Pala, because its recitals and operative covenants showed that the divided rights and duties of shebaitship were made over to the transferee and his successors. A reservation of part of the rent did not negate that transfer. The transfer was also treated as valid against the executant's legal heirs, since transfer of shebaiti rights was permissible where supported by family custom or justified by the deity's benefit, and the materials did not establish any legal bar or absence of necessity. The plaintiff's claim to the transferred right succeeded. en-us Mon, 31 Jul 1972 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Jan 2025 18:20:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460215 An Arpannama was construed, read with the connected lease arrangement, as an absolute transfer of the shebaiti right represented by the Pala, because its recitals and operative covenants showed that the divided rights and duties of shebaitship were made over to the transferee and his successors. A reservation of part of the rent did not negate that transfer. The transfer was also treated as valid against the executant's legal heirs, since transfer of shebaiti rights was permissible where supported by family custom or justified by the deity's benefit, and the materials did not establish any legal bar or absence of necessity. The plaintiff's claim to the transferred right succeeded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 31 Jul 1972 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460215