<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1968 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460200</link>
    <description>The company was found unable to meet its debts because its financial position, admitted default, recovery action by the secured creditor, and no effective response to the statutory notice showed persistent inability to pay. The petition was also duly advertised and the statutory requirements were satisfied, leading to an order for winding up and appointment of the Official Liquidator as liquidator.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 13:46:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=789134" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1968 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460200</link>
      <description>The company was found unable to meet its debts because its financial position, admitted default, recovery action by the secured creditor, and no effective response to the statutory notice showed persistent inability to pay. The petition was also duly advertised and the statutory requirements were satisfied, leading to an order for winding up and appointment of the Official Liquidator as liquidator.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460200</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>