<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (5) TMI 65 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40367</link>
    <description>The State&#039;s clear and unequivocal representation, made through executive announcements, a budget speech, memoranda, circulars and departmental communications, that purchase tax on milk stood abolished from 1 April 1996 bound it in promissory estoppel. The representation was within the State&#039;s power to exempt milk from tax by notification, and the affected parties altered their position by acting on it and passing on the benefit to producers. As no overriding public interest or legal bar was shown, the State could not resile from the representation or demand purchase tax retrospectively for the period during which it operated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2025 11:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=78906" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (5) TMI 65 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40367</link>
      <description>The State&#039;s clear and unequivocal representation, made through executive announcements, a budget speech, memoranda, circulars and departmental communications, that purchase tax on milk stood abolished from 1 April 1996 bound it in promissory estoppel. The representation was within the State&#039;s power to exempt milk from tax by notification, and the affected parties altered their position by acting on it and passing on the benefit to producers. As no overriding public interest or legal bar was shown, the State could not resile from the representation or demand purchase tax retrospectively for the period during which it operated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40367</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>