https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764604 Contempt jurisdiction may be used to test whether operative directions in an earlier writ judgment were obeyed, but it does not permit re-adjudication of the underlying dispute. Where a later order disregards the limited remit of a remand and repeats a conclusion already rejected, the Court may treat it as defiance of the prior judgment and issue restitutive directions, including recall of the impugned order and a fresh decision in accordance with the earlier ruling and natural justice. The Court may stop short of recording wilful disobedience while still securing compliance with the earlier writ judgment. en-us Mon, 06 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Jan 2025 14:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764604 Contempt jurisdiction may be used to test whether operative directions in an earlier writ judgment were obeyed, but it does not permit re-adjudication of the underlying dispute. Where a later order disregards the limited remit of a remand and repeats a conclusion already rejected, the Court may treat it as defiance of the prior judgment and issue restitutive directions, including recall of the impugned order and a fresh decision in accordance with the earlier ruling and natural justice. The Court may stop short of recording wilful disobedience while still securing compliance with the earlier writ judgment. Case-Laws VAT / Sales Tax Mon, 06 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764604