<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 671 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764607</link>
    <description>Once a resolution plan is approved under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, claims not forming part of the plan stand frozen and cease to survive. Because the approved plan is binding on stakeholders and extinguished claims cannot be pursued further, the appellate tribunal treated the appeal as no longer open for adjudication and considered itself functus officio in relation to the matter. The appeal was therefore treated as abated and disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2025 17:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=788997" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 671 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764607</link>
      <description>Once a resolution plan is approved under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, claims not forming part of the plan stand frozen and cease to survive. Because the approved plan is binding on stakeholders and extinguished claims cannot be pursued further, the appellate tribunal treated the appeal as no longer open for adjudication and considered itself functus officio in relation to the matter. The appeal was therefore treated as abated and disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764607</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>