<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 695 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764631</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai upheld reassessment proceedings under section 147 based on information from Investigation Wing, finding sufficient material to form requisite belief that income escaped assessment. The tribunal confirmed addition under section 69C for bogus purchases from M/s Swastik Corporation, as the assessee failed to prove genuineness. However, following M. Haji Adam Co. precedent, the ITAT set aside CIT(A)&#039;s order and directed AO to restrict addition by applying gross profit rate on bogus purchases at same rate as genuine purchases. If gross profit rate on bogus purchases was higher and already offered to tax, no further addition was warranted. Appeal allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 07:36:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=788973" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 695 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764631</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai upheld reassessment proceedings under section 147 based on information from Investigation Wing, finding sufficient material to form requisite belief that income escaped assessment. The tribunal confirmed addition under section 69C for bogus purchases from M/s Swastik Corporation, as the assessee failed to prove genuineness. However, following M. Haji Adam Co. precedent, the ITAT set aside CIT(A)&#039;s order and directed AO to restrict addition by applying gross profit rate on bogus purchases at same rate as genuine purchases. If gross profit rate on bogus purchases was higher and already offered to tax, no further addition was warranted. Appeal allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764631</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>