https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764639 The HC dismissed the petition, emphasizing that the petitioner should pursue the alternative statutory remedy available under the Income Tax Act instead of seeking relief through writ jurisdiction. The court did not delve into the merits of the case, as the petitioner had an alternative remedy. The court upheld the respondent's argument regarding the validity of the reassessment notice under Sections 148-A(d) and 149(1) of the Income Tax Act, citing the statutory provisions and previous court decisions. The court reiterated the principle that writ jurisdiction should not be exercised when an alternative remedy exists. en-us Fri, 20 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Jan 2025 10:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764639 The HC dismissed the petition, emphasizing that the petitioner should pursue the alternative statutory remedy available under the Income Tax Act instead of seeking relief through writ jurisdiction. The court did not delve into the merits of the case, as the petitioner had an alternative remedy. The court upheld the respondent's argument regarding the validity of the reassessment notice under Sections 148-A(d) and 149(1) of the Income Tax Act, citing the statutory provisions and previous court decisions. The court reiterated the principle that writ jurisdiction should not be exercised when an alternative remedy exists. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 20 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764639