<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 706 - JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764642</link>
    <description>Complaint proceedings alleging offences under the Income-tax Act were not fit for quashing under Section 482 CrPC at the initial stage because the complaint disclosed cognizable offences under Sections 276C(1) and 277, treated as cognizable under Section 279A. The Court held that, while considering quashing, it cannot test the truthfulness of the allegations or evaluate the defence case; such disputed pleas must be left to trial. The petitioners&#039; arguments that the allegations were false, premature, or did not disclose an offence were therefore treated as matters of defence, and the criminal proceedings were allowed to continue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2025 17:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=788962" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 706 - JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764642</link>
      <description>Complaint proceedings alleging offences under the Income-tax Act were not fit for quashing under Section 482 CrPC at the initial stage because the complaint disclosed cognizable offences under Sections 276C(1) and 277, treated as cognizable under Section 279A. The Court held that, while considering quashing, it cannot test the truthfulness of the allegations or evaluate the defence case; such disputed pleas must be left to trial. The petitioners&#039; arguments that the allegations were false, premature, or did not disclose an offence were therefore treated as matters of defence, and the criminal proceedings were allowed to continue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764642</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>