<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 715 - MADHYA PRADES HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764651</link>
    <description>HC held the petitioner was entitled to recovery of the GST shortfall and interest, and that the writ petition was maintainable. The respondent was held liable to pay the difference attributable to the enhanced GST rate along with applicable interest. The court directed payment of the admitted liability and disposed of the petition accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2025 14:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=788953" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 715 - MADHYA PRADES HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764651</link>
      <description>HC held the petitioner was entitled to recovery of the GST shortfall and interest, and that the writ petition was maintainable. The respondent was held liable to pay the difference attributable to the enhanced GST rate along with applicable interest. The court directed payment of the admitted liability and disposed of the petition accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764651</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>