https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764662 Anticipatory bail was granted in a GST prosecution alleging tax evasion and related offences because custodial interrogation was not considered necessary. The court noted that more than five years had passed since registration of the FIR, the investigation was largely documentary, and the input tax credit availed by the petitioner's firm had already been reversed. It also took into account that the main accused had obtained regular bail and a similarly placed co-accused had been granted anticipatory bail, supporting parity in favour of the petitioner. en-us Wed, 08 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Jul 2025 14:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764662 Anticipatory bail was granted in a GST prosecution alleging tax evasion and related offences because custodial interrogation was not considered necessary. The court noted that more than five years had passed since registration of the FIR, the investigation was largely documentary, and the input tax credit availed by the petitioner's firm had already been reversed. It also took into account that the main accused had obtained regular bail and a similarly placed co-accused had been granted anticipatory bail, supporting parity in favour of the petitioner. Case-Laws GST Wed, 08 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764662