<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 1244 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460169</link>
    <description>The challenge to the SEBI order was remanded to SEBI for reconsideration in light of the approach adopted in a connected matter. The remand left all issues open, so the parties were not precluded from advancing their positions on reconsideration. The appellant was also required to comply with the earlier direction to furnish assets, which continued to operate pending further determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2025 19:59:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=788901" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 1244 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460169</link>
      <description>The challenge to the SEBI order was remanded to SEBI for reconsideration in light of the approach adopted in a connected matter. The remand left all issues open, so the parties were not precluded from advancing their positions on reconsideration. The appellant was also required to comply with the earlier direction to furnish assets, which continued to operate pending further determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460169</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>