https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460171 Section 151 CPC may be used to terminate a suit at the threshold where the pleadings and admitted material show an abuse of process and no surviving enforceable right, even if the objection requires reference to material beyond the plaint. A prior Supreme Court decision may operate as binding on the claimant's asserted interest in the property if its reasoning necessarily negatived that interest. A fresh suit on the same subject-matter after withdrawal without liberty is barred by Order XXIII Rule 1, and a damages claim arising from the same cause of action may be barred by Order II Rule 2. In a composite title-and-possession claim, Article 65 governs limitation. Suppression of an earlier suit and its withdrawal is a material concealment affecting discretionary relief. en-us Wed, 28 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Jan 2025 13:23:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460171 Section 151 CPC may be used to terminate a suit at the threshold where the pleadings and admitted material show an abuse of process and no surviving enforceable right, even if the objection requires reference to material beyond the plaint. A prior Supreme Court decision may operate as binding on the claimant's asserted interest in the property if its reasoning necessarily negatived that interest. A fresh suit on the same subject-matter after withdrawal without liberty is barred by Order XXIII Rule 1, and a damages claim arising from the same cause of action may be barred by Order II Rule 2. In a composite title-and-possession claim, Article 65 governs limitation. Suppression of an earlier suit and its withdrawal is a material concealment affecting discretionary relief. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 28 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460171