<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1756 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460174</link>
    <description>The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) dismissed the review application regarding an alleged anti-competitive arrangement between M/s Lupin Ltd and the Karnataka Chemists &amp; Druggists Association. The Tribunal upheld the previous decision by the Competition Appellate Tribunal (COMPAT), which found no substantial evidence of an anti-competitive agreement. The review application was deemed not maintainable due to the absence of new evidence or errors in the original decision, and because the matter was pending before the Supreme Court. The Tribunal affirmed that COMPAT&#039;s decision remained binding.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2025 16:41:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=788896" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1756 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460174</link>
      <description>The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) dismissed the review application regarding an alleged anti-competitive arrangement between M/s Lupin Ltd and the Karnataka Chemists &amp; Druggists Association. The Tribunal upheld the previous decision by the Competition Appellate Tribunal (COMPAT), which found no substantial evidence of an anti-competitive agreement. The review application was deemed not maintainable due to the absence of new evidence or errors in the original decision, and because the matter was pending before the Supreme Court. The Tribunal affirmed that COMPAT&#039;s decision remained binding.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Law of Competition</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460174</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>