https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460181 The NCLAT dismissed an appeal filed 730 days after the Competition Commission of India's order dated 28th November, 2017. The appellant spent 693 days pursuing writ remedies before the HC, claiming denial of natural justice. The NCLAT held that no cogent reason existed for the two-year delay in filing the statutory appeal under Section 53B of the Competition Act, 2002. The tribunal ruled that when efficacious statutory remedies exist, litigants cannot forum shop by invoking writ jurisdiction under pretext of natural justice violations. The appeal was dismissed as time-barred without sufficient cause for delay. en-us Fri, 29 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Jan 2025 18:43:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460181 The NCLAT dismissed an appeal filed 730 days after the Competition Commission of India's order dated 28th November, 2017. The appellant spent 693 days pursuing writ remedies before the HC, claiming denial of natural justice. The NCLAT held that no cogent reason existed for the two-year delay in filing the statutory appeal under Section 53B of the Competition Act, 2002. The tribunal ruled that when efficacious statutory remedies exist, litigants cannot forum shop by invoking writ jurisdiction under pretext of natural justice violations. The appeal was dismissed as time-barred without sufficient cause for delay. Case-Laws Law of Competition Fri, 29 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460181