https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460186 Limitation for filing the appeal ran from the date the impugned order was originally pronounced, because a later order correcting a typographical error in the recorded year did not substantively modify, alter, or merge with that decision. The correction order therefore did not restart or extend limitation. As the appeal was filed beyond the statutory condonable period, and no sufficient ground for condonation was shown, the delay was held not condonable and the application was rejected. en-us Sat, 13 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Jan 2025 19:59:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460186 Limitation for filing the appeal ran from the date the impugned order was originally pronounced, because a later order correcting a typographical error in the recorded year did not substantively modify, alter, or merge with that decision. The correction order therefore did not restart or extend limitation. As the appeal was filed beyond the statutory condonable period, and no sufficient ground for condonation was shown, the delay was held not condonable and the application was rejected. Case-Laws IBC Sat, 13 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460186